[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPX and 2.1.103

To: linux-tr@emissary.aus-etc.com
Subject: Re: IPX and 2.1.103
From: Paul Norton <pnorton@ccnvhi.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 09:18:16 -0700
In-reply-to: <199806140912.EAA01063@verdict.uthscsa.edu>
References: <199806111551.IAA05603@grumpy.ccnvhi.com><199806140912.EAA01063@verdict.uthscsa.edu>
Reply-to: linux-tr@emissary.aus-etc.com
Sender: owner-linux-tr@emissary.aus-etc.com

I expect that I'll get that code working in the couple of days. 
However, Linus has put a freeze on new features and I don't know if
this would be considered as such.  Once I get it working and tested
I'll submit it and see what happens.  (In other words, I'll pass the
buck...) 

Gilbert Ramirez Jr. writes:
 > Do you think it will be possible to remove the 802.2TR module altogether
 > and use only the 802.2 module in the 2.1.x series, or is it best left alone
 > for the 2.3.x series?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPX and 2.1.103
  - From: Mike Eckhoff <bert@willy.wsc.edu>

References:
- IPX and 2.1.103
  - From: Paul Norton <pnorton@ccnvhi.com>
- Re: IPX and 2.1.103
  - From: "Gilbert Ramirez Jr." <gram@verdict.uthscsa.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: IPX and 2.1.103
Next by Date: Re: IPX and 2.1.103
Previous by thread: Re: IPX and 2.1.103
Next by thread: Re: IPX and 2.1.103
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread